The Debate About Terrorism Essay - 2667 Words

Although the debate about terrorism has especially sparked in the past decades, terrorism is not a new phenomenon and it has been used since the beginning of recorded history. Nevertheless, it is rather difficult to define terrorism. Depending on from which side one assesses terrorism it can be defined as either a tactic or a strategy, a crime or a holy duty, a heinousness or a justified reaction to oppression. Terrorism uses coercive power with many of the advantages of military force, but with only a fraction of the cost and due to their small size covert operations, it is difficult for governments to actually deter or defend against terrorist organizations. Terrorism has thus become one of the most threatening phenomena for citizens†¦show more content†¦II. Why terrorism can be a successful strategy In general, the strategy of terrorism is rather used by feeble or powerless actors since groups with other options to draw attention to their message and political goals, such as winning elections, organizing public demonstrations or removing the current government through a conspiracy or a coup d’à ©tat, do not need to resort to terrorist actions. Since terrorism is thus the weapon of the weak, it will often fail to achieve its political objectives of the organization (Lutz Lutz, 2009: 2). However, this does not mean that the strategy of terrorism cannot be effective. Terrorist groups usually have several goals and objectives, and they may fail to achieve all of them but are sometimes successful in achieving at least some of them. Their public statements and messages provide governments and counterterrorism experts with some insights, but one has to keep in mind that some of these statements are only propaganda created to mobilize support, and the stated objectives may not always be the actual or most important goals of the terror organization. Terrorist groups sometimes claim to seek more than they actually hope toShow MoreRelatedThe Debate On Abortion And Gun Control1604 Words   |  7 Pageswith the governance of a country or other area. This especially applies to the debate or conflict among individuals or parties in hope of achieving power. Dealing with politics there is always a side that agrees and disagrees, thus developing the debate. Two of the most domestic controversial political topics are abortion and gun control. As for international there is terrorism. These three topics have been ongoing debates for some time. Everyone’s opinion on political controversies can be based onRead MoreEssay about The War on Terrorism and the US Propaganda Machine1026 Words   |  5 Pages The War on Terrorism and the US Propaganda Machine nbsp; Totalitarian regimes control their people by bludgeoning and incarcerating them. Critics of Western societies claim that democratic governments maintain approval for their actions through the manufacture of consent, a cryptic and insidious form of propaganda. nbsp; How?, you ask skeptically. By framing the debate, the theory says. By setting up a debate between two opposing acceptable views--one slightly left of governmentRead MoreThe Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism by Pape, Bloom, and Horowitz 1429 Words   |  6 Pagesâ€Å"Terrorism involves the use of violence by an organization other than a national government to cause intimidation or fear among a target audience;† at least, this is how Pape (2003) defines terrorism in his article â€Å"The Strategic Logic of Suicide Terrorism† (343). The goal of this article by Pape is to discuss suicide terrorism and how it â€Å"follows a strategic logic, one specifically designed to coerce modern liberal democracies to make significant territorial concessions† (343). Similar to Pape,Read MoreThe Law Enforcement Operations Model1619 Words   |  7 PagesAs discussed in the next section, some critics of these types of responses to transnational terrorism argue that a law enfor cement operations model should be applied rather than the law of armed conflict because of the nature of the operations that are involved. For instance, Kels notes that human rights advocates â€Å"insist upon a legal geography of war, whereby states must apply a law enforcement (rather than armed conflict) model to any hostilities conducted outside of universally recognized hotRead MoreMonitoring And Collection Of Phone Data1521 Words   |  7 PagesAll around the world, terrorism has become a serious issue and has struck fear into the hearts of many. In the United States, a debate has arisen about the monitoring and collection of phone data. It is a matter of privacy versus security; in order for the country to be more secure against terrorism, the public must give up some privacy in the form of phone data. Phone data should only be collected when it comes to serious threats to national security using a warrant provided by the judicial systemRead MoreExtending Terrorism Insuranc e691 Words   |  3 Pagescauses a sharp decline in the number of businesses with terrorism coverage, we find that the federal government could spend billions more in disaster assistance after an attack than it would with the program in place† (â€Å"Extending terrorism insurance,† 2014). Act creates an incentive for a functioning private terrorism insurance market through the promise of government support for losses that exceed a specified amount (â€Å"Extending terrorism insurance,† 2014). The analysis finds that in a terroristRead MoreThe Great Debate : Privacy Vs National Security1055 Words   |  5 PagesMichael Haggerty Mrs. Gallos English III Honors 18 April 2016 The Great Debate: Privacy vs National Security In the digital age, the citizens of the United States are torn between which they value more: privacy or national security. On one hand, the people need to be safe from cyber attacks and terrorism, while on the other, the government should be aware of the privacy of the people it governs. The government should not go so far in protecting the country that it interferes with the personal livesRead MoreTerrorists versus Muslims1151 Words   |  5 Pagesno more about making bombs or plotting against the government than most do. Michael Gerson of the Washington Post argues in his 2013 article â€Å"Tied in Knots by Radicalism† that, â€Å"Islam is a diverse religious tradition including more than 1 billion people and millions of our fellow citizens who overwhelmingly reject the murder of random strangers as an expression of their faith. Terrorism is the expression of a violent ideology that has, disturbingly, taken root among some Muslims. Debates over theRead MoreThe Governmen ts Fight Against Crime Essay1052 Words   |  5 Pagesthe controversy evolved from transition of a new system to how well the government is functioning on the new system. With the introduction of the I.D. Cards bill in the Queen’s speech on 17th May 2005, the government was again confronted about its dedication to the new rules. There was a time, when the U.K. government was following the due process model of criminal justice system. Simply put, the due process model says that we are ‘innocent until proven guilty’, that judgesRead MoreThe Patriot Act Impact On America1428 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction: When an incident occurs the government and public react in various has changed the mind set of many Americans. Terrorism on the rise around the world made government officials to take proper precautions and changes in protocol. Our nation attempted to prepare for the worse scenarios. Events of 9/11 shocked most citizens and government officials. In response President Bush signed the Patriot Act, however since provisions expired later President Obama had to reactivate the Patriot

The Australian National Mental Health - 1191 Words

Mental illness has a profound impact on the Australian community, with 45% of Australians expected to experience mental illness at some point in their lives. In 1991, Australian Health Ministers commenced The Australian National Mental Health Strategy, which has since transitioned to its Fourth National Mental Health Plan Agreement. The Australian healthcare policy that has recently received attention in the Australian media is the revised National Mental Health Policy of 2008. The media article, ‘‘Futures will be lost’: Health fears as youth psychosis program dropped,’ has been analysed on its illustration of current structural reform proposed in the Mental Health sector. The role of media is critical in conveying policy to the public and†¦show more content†¦How does the media portray this issue? Author Jane Lee writing for the Sydney Morning Herald, evokes an emotional response within readers from the get-go in true left wing fashion. The doom and gloom heading elicits fear by using bleak words such as ‘lost, fear and dropped’ to describe the future health of young Australians experiencing psychosis. Delving into the first paragraph, the author capitalises on the power of expert opinion, bequeathed by ‘Leading mental health expert’, Patrick McGorry. McGorry is referenced multiple times during the article, expressing a strong opinion opposing the abolishment of funding for the hYEPP. If that alone is not enough to convince a lay person to side with the article, McGorry exclaims ‘almost certainly, lives will be lost’ when referring the closure of the program. This parallels with concerns ‘Futures will be lost,’ if adequate infrastructure is not put in place to facilitate patients with psychosis back into school, social settings or the workforce. Increased rates of suicide within the schizophrenic patient population is a grim reality of the disease and readers will most likely empathize. It is important to note, that Patrick McGorry, ‘Leading mental health expert’ is also the pioneer of Early Intervention in Psychiatry, namely the Early Psychosis Intervention Prevention Model. The is the evidence-based model, to which the hYEPP has been constructed on. Patrick

Fort Henry And Donelson Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Fort Henry And Donelson Essay, Research Paper Fort Donelson, Tennessee, guarding the Cumberland River, became the site of the first major Confederate licking in the Civil War. Victory at Donelson started Brigadier General Ulysses S. Grant on his route to Appomattox and the White House. His cool judgement under force per unit area saved the twenty-four hours after the Confederates threatened to interrupt his troop lines, yet errors by his oppositions handed him a triumph that he did non to the full gain on his ain. Possession of the better portion of two provinces critical to the South depended on the result of the conflict at Fort Donelson. When war began in April 1861, Kentucky declared its neutrality, in response to deep struggles of sentiment among its citizens. Sing neutrality impossible to keep, North and South maneuvered for place one time Kentucky was opened to military operations. The Confederates constructed munitions on both the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers merely south of the Kentucky line. They built Fort Henry on the Tennessee River, on land susceptible to implosion therapy, but chose higher land for Fort Donelson on the Cumberland River. Both sides wanted Kentucky but recognized that the first to traverse its boundary lines risked losing popular support. Confederate Brigadier General Gideon J. Pillow headlong seized Columbus, Kentucky, on the Mississippi River bluffs, a move that appalled President Jefferson Davis, who foremost ordered Pillow to retreat, so allowed him to remain when he realized that the title could non be reversed. Grant, commanding at Cairo, Illinois, so occupied Paducah at the oral cavity of the Tennessee and Smithland at the oral cavity of the Cumberland, strategic points neglected by General Gideon Pillow. In November Grant tested Confederate strength at Columbus by set downing military personnels across the Mississippi River at Belmont, Missouri. The drawn conflict that followed sent him back to Cairo still eager to progress, but non needfully along the Mississippi River. Knowing of the hapless location of Fort Henry, he wanted to utilize Union gunboats to advantage, and foresaw that the autumn of Fort Henry would open the Tennessee River as far north as Alabama. Wining loath permission from his higher-up, Major General Henry W. Halleck, Grant moved south in early February. The afloat Fort Henry fell to the gunboats on February 6, 1862 and most of the fort fled to Fort Donelson, which was 11 stat mis off. Grant so followed, after directing the gunboats back down the Tennessee and over to the Cumberland. In St. Louis, Halleck, a # 8220 ; military administrative official par excellence # 8221 ; , took no official penetration of Grant s programs. If Grant captured Fort Donelson, Hallec k would presume recognition ; if Grant failed, he would avoid duty. Confederate General Albert Sidney Johnston, overall commanding officer in the West, concentrated his military personnels at Fort Donelson, expecting the loss of Nashville if Donelson fell. Torn between supporting and abandoning the garrison, Johnston took a in-between class that led to catastrophe. He was criticized subsequently for directing so many military personnels to Donelson with out directing his whole force and taking bid himself. By the clip Grant arrived, with about 15, 000 work forces. Donelson held about 21,000, including at least two generals excessively many. Brigadier General John B. Floyd, who was commanding Donelson, had been a former secretary of war in the cabinet of President James Buchanan and was widely suspected by Northerners of reassigning weaponries and weaponries due south before the rebellion broke out. Pillow, the second-in-command, had small regard from his ain work forces and disdain from Grant. Third in line but first in ability was Brigadier General Simon B. Buckner, the lone professional soldier of the three. Fort Donelson consisted of earthworks environing abut 15 estates, where the fort lived in huts. Two batteries outside the garrison commanded the river, and about two stat mis of munitions, protecting both the heavy weapon campsite and the nearby crossroads of Dover, stretched from Hickman Creek on the right to Lick Creek on the left. The brook, flooded in February, protected both wings. Confederate officers and applied scientists had complained continuously of deficits of work forces and supplies to finish the munitions, but Federal forced encountered formidable earthworks fronted by trees fell, tangled, and sharpen erectile dysfunction to blockade the onslaught. Grant advanced on February 12, and began to encircle Fort Donelson the following twenty-four hours, telling Brigadier General Charles F. Smith s division to look into the Confederate right, commanded by Buckner, and Brigadier General John A. McClenand s division to look into the Confederate left, under Brigadier General Bushrod R. Johnson. Grant found the Confederate lines excessively strong and good positioned for assault. Trusting on this strength, nevertheless, the Confederates permitted Union military personnels to finish a practical blockade, go forthing merely a little spread on their right, and to choose high land for their base. If Grant s daring had been matched by his oppositions, they might hold struck Union military personnels as they marched on two separate roads to Donelson, or the Confederates might hold counterattacked at Donelson while they had superior Numberss and Grant lacked naval support. However, they did non. Flag Officer Andrew H. Foote s gunboat fleet arrive d tardily at dark, transporting fresh military personnels, and a division commanded by Brigadier General Lewis Wallace marched from Fort Henry. Ultimately, Grant s army numbered 27,000. Both ground forcess froze when nightlong temperatures out of the blue fell to twelve grades Fahrenheit. On February 14, Foote tested the H2O batteries with six war vessels, four of the ironclads, and the batteries prevailed, bring downing heavy harm on the flotilla. Although to a great extent outgunned, artillerists found the scope when the gunboats came to shut, and the fleet suffered excessively much to restart the assault. The following moorage Grant consulted Foote on his flagship, where he lay immobilized by a would inflicted by the Confederate batteries. While they discussed their following move, Pillow struck the Union right with lay waste toing force. Buckner s line was denuded as the Confederates massed military personnels to interrupt free of encirclment. McClernand s right began to turn over back on the centre, until supports from Wallace halted the winning Confederates. Why the combat diminished, Pillow held the Forge Road, taking to Nashville. Pillow had tow sound picks ; to press the onslaught to consolidate triumph or to interrupt free of Grant s clasp by evacuating Fort Donelson. Inexplicable, he reflected both and withdrew his original line. Stung by the forenoon offense, the Union stoops were confused and demoralized until Grant returned. Inspecting the backpacks of fallen Confederates, which contained rations for three yearss, Grant concluded that the assault represented a despairing attempt to get away and ordered his military personnels to press the enemy. Smith s division was successful against Buckner s weakened line, which put U.S. military personnels inside the Confederate munitions. Otherwise, the three yearss of contending had left the ground forcess near to their initial places. Grant s supports, nevertheless, were much exaggerated in the Confederate imaginativeness, and Floyd and Pillow had squandered their lone chance to evacuate. During the eventide of February 15, the Confederate commanding officers planned the resignation. Floyd relinquished bid to Pillow and Pillow to Buckner. The top brass slipped off by H2O with about 2,000 work forces. Colonel Nathan Bedford Forrest led his horse and a few foot safely by land to Nashville. When Buckner asked Grant to name commissioners to negociate the footings of resignation, Grant responded that # 8220 ; no footings except an immediate resignation can be accepted. # 8221 ; Denouncing this as a response as # 8220 ; meanspirited and caddish, # 8221 ; Buckner surrendered anyhow. Meeting subsequently at the Dover Hotel, Buckner told his old friend and military academy classmate that if he had held bid, Union forces would non hold encircled Donelson so easy. Allow answered that if Buckner had been in bid, he ( Grant ) would gave chosen different tactics. Grant lost 2,832 who where killed or wounded. Floyd about 2,000, but Grant took over about 15,000 captives, 48 heavy weapon pieces, and other war stuff the South could non afford to lose. The Confederates fell back from Kentucky and from much of in-between Tennessee, abandoning Nashville. Grant won celebrity and publicity, while both Floyd and Pillow lost bid. Robert E. Lee s later successes in Virginia obscured the significance of Fort Donelson as the first measure toward the Confederate loss of the West, which spelled day of reckoning for the new state.